Saving Statute Not Always Precluded by Tolling Agreements

Circle C Construction, LLC v. D. Sean Nilsen Et Al., (Tenn. Mar. 7, 2016)

The Tennessee Supreme Court sent a clear warning in Circle C. Construction, LLC v. D. Sean Nilsen; craft tolling agreements with clear intentions and even clearer language. The Court decided that absent specific language in a tolling agreement, a plaintiff retains the right to refile suit under the Tennessee savings statute. The Tennessee savings statute allows a party to refile suit within one (1) year after a voluntary nonsuit, if the first action was commenced within the time limited by a rule or statute of limitation. Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-1-105(a).

In Circle C, Circle C Construction and the Nilsen law firm entered into a tolling agreement regarding Circle C’s claim against Nilsen for professional negligence. The tolling agreement provided that Circle C’s claim would be tolled until 120 days after the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion on the appeal brought by Circle C in the case in which Nilsen defended Circle C. Following the Sixth Circuit’s decision, Circle C filed a professional negligence suit against Nilsen within the extended statute of limitations. Circle C then voluntarily nonsuited its action. Circle C then refiled the suit within one year of the nonsuit in compliance with the savings statute; however, the refiling was not within the contractually set statute of limitations. Nilsen moved for summary judgment on the basis that Circle C was precluded from refiling suit outside of their contractually set statute of limitations.

After carefully evaluating the tolling agreement, and touting the remedial nature of the savings statute, the Court stated that “in the absence of evidence of contrary intention, the parties must be held to have contemplated the application of that law to the terms of their agreement.” Accordingly, Circle C’s cause of action against Nilsen was allowed to persist under the savings statute despite the tolling agreement.

In light of this ruling, it will continue to be important to carefully craft tolling agreements to include language specifically precluding plaintiffs from utilizing the savings statute.

For more information, please contact Sean W. Martin at swmartin@carrallison.com. Ashley Baxter (abaxter@carrallison.com), associate in the Chattanooga office assisted with this post.

News

Kirkpatrick, Oliver and Martin Named 2025 Mid-South Super Lawyers®

Carr Allison shareholders Donald B. Kirkpatrick, II, Thomas L. Oliver, II and Sean W. Martin have been named 2025 Mid-South Super Lawyers®. Attorneys are selected to be Super Lawyers® through a rigorous process of peer nominations, peer evaluations and third-party research. Congratulations!

Learn More

Hallford, Harlan, Miller, Norwood, Petherick, Van Camp, Hill, Swanson and Townsley Named as 2025 Mid-South Super Lawyers® Rising Stars

Carr Allison is proud to announce that attorneys Pamela Springrose Hallford, Nicole M. Harlan, Chancey R. Miller, Wade Norwood, Michael J. Petherick, Katie R. Van Camp, Tinsley Griffin Hill, Stephen A. Swanson and Alex Townsley have been selected as 2025 Mid-South Super Lawyers® Rising Stars. Rising Stars are selected through a rigorous process of peer nominations, peer evaluations and third-party research. Eligibility is limited […]

Learn More

Zwilling to Present Webinar on ETHICS: Ethical Considerations Concerning Artificial Intelligence in Legal, Employment and Insurance Relationships

At first glance, it may seem that a failure to embrace AI is unwise and shortsighted.  Upon closer examination, however, the myriad ethical issues involved establish just the opposite.  During this webinar, we will explore a multitude of ethical issues that should be considered in connection with the use of […]

Learn More