Saving Statute Not Always Precluded by Tolling Agreements

Circle C Construction, LLC v. D. Sean Nilsen Et Al., (Tenn. Mar. 7, 2016)

The Tennessee Supreme Court sent a clear warning in Circle C. Construction, LLC v. D. Sean Nilsen; craft tolling agreements with clear intentions and even clearer language. The Court decided that absent specific language in a tolling agreement, a plaintiff retains the right to refile suit under the Tennessee savings statute. The Tennessee savings statute allows a party to refile suit within one (1) year after a voluntary nonsuit, if the first action was commenced within the time limited by a rule or statute of limitation. Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-1-105(a).

In Circle C, Circle C Construction and the Nilsen law firm entered into a tolling agreement regarding Circle C’s claim against Nilsen for professional negligence. The tolling agreement provided that Circle C’s claim would be tolled until 120 days after the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion on the appeal brought by Circle C in the case in which Nilsen defended Circle C. Following the Sixth Circuit’s decision, Circle C filed a professional negligence suit against Nilsen within the extended statute of limitations. Circle C then voluntarily nonsuited its action. Circle C then refiled the suit within one year of the nonsuit in compliance with the savings statute; however, the refiling was not within the contractually set statute of limitations. Nilsen moved for summary judgment on the basis that Circle C was precluded from refiling suit outside of their contractually set statute of limitations.

After carefully evaluating the tolling agreement, and touting the remedial nature of the savings statute, the Court stated that “in the absence of evidence of contrary intention, the parties must be held to have contemplated the application of that law to the terms of their agreement.” Accordingly, Circle C’s cause of action against Nilsen was allowed to persist under the savings statute despite the tolling agreement.

In light of this ruling, it will continue to be important to carefully craft tolling agreements to include language specifically precluding plaintiffs from utilizing the savings statute.

For more information, please contact Sean W. Martin at swmartin@carrallison.com. Ashley Baxter (abaxter@carrallison.com), associate in the Chattanooga office assisted with this post.

News

Wells Speaks at Federal Court Naturalization Ceremony for New Citizens

Carr Allison shareholder and retired Mobile County District Judge Judson W. Wells, Sr. recently spoke at the March Naturalization Ceremony in Mobile. The formal ceremony was conducted by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. In his capacity as Past President of the Mobile Bar Association, Judge Wells […]

Learn More

Zwilling to Present Webinar on AI in Employment Decisions and What Employers Need to Know

Course Description: Is your company using AI to screen resumes, conduct video interviews, or make hiring decisions?  If so, you could be facing significant legal exposure without even knowing it.  With new laws in Illinois, Colorado, New York City, and other jurisdictions imposing strict requirements on employers using artificial intelligence, […]

Learn More

Carr Joins USLAW Live Podcast

Join Carr Allison co-founder Charles Carr on the latest USLAW Live! podcast episode as he reflects on the conversation that sparked the creation of USLAW and the leadership and vision that helped shape the network over the past 25 years. Charles also shares insights on client service, succession planning, mentorship […]

Learn More