Medical Providers Assignment for Third-Party Liability Insurance Proceeds is Unenforceable

Medical Providers Assignment for Third-Party Liability Insurance Proceeds is Unenforceable

Action Chiropractic Clinic v. Prentice Delon Hyler,
2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 73 (Tenn. Ct. App.  Feb. 12, 2014)

 

On October 24, 2011, William Burnette crashed his vehicle into Prentice Hyler. Burnette was insured by Erie Insurance Exchange. Hyler was injured in the accident and received medical treatment from Action Chiropractic Clinic. In exchange for the medical treatment, Hyler executed an assignment of rights to Action Chiropractic for medical expenses allowable and payable to Hyler from any “…auto insurance or any other party involved.” Erie/Burnette settled with Hyler for $8,510 and Hyler executed a release of all claims. Action Chiropractic then sent the assignment to Erie and demanded that Erie reimburse Action Chiropractic for $5,010 in outstanding medical bills. Erie refused and Action Chiropractic sued.

The Court, in affirming the dismissal of Action Chiropractic’s case, holds that the assignment between Hyler and Action Chiropractic could not be enforceable against Erie under Tennessee Code Annotated § 56-7-120 since Hyler was not within the category of individuals covered under Erie’s insurance policy. Moreover, while Hyler had a common law right to assign his “rights” to Action Chiropractic, Erie was not obligated to honor the assignment because Hyler did not have any “rights” under the Erie insurance policy that could be assigned to action and subsequently enforced.

 

Sean W. Martin, is a shareholder in the Chattanooga, Tennessee office of Carr Allison.  Sean can be reached at swmartin@carrallison.com or (423) 648-9834. 

News

Miller and Muhonen Obtain Dismissal

Chancey Miller and Stephen Muhonen of our Chattanooga (TN) office succeeded in obtaining the dismissal of a significant security case for a retail client. In a case where a convenience store employee was assaulted while confronting a shoplifter, allegations were that the retailer failed to provide proper security which was an […]

Learn More

Sausaman Prevails on a Motion for Summary Judgment

Alison H. Sausaman of our Jacksonville (FL) office prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in federal court on behalf of a national convenience store chain. The court agreed that rain on an asphalt parking lot was not a dangerous condition and granted final judgment in our client’s favor.

Learn More

Baggett and Ingram Prevail on a Motion for Judgment

Evan Baggett and Josh Ingram of our Birmingham (AL) office recently prevailed on a motion for judgment on the pleadings in a complex tort case. After extensive briefing and oral arguments, the court granted their motion and dismissed all the plaintiff’s claims with prejudice.

Learn More