DOL Withdraws Worker Classification Guidance

On June 7, 2017, the US Department of Labor (DOL) withdrew its 2015 and 2016 informal guidance related to classification of workers as independent contractors (where a worker is not considered an employee of the business for which the individual is providing work) or joint employees (where a worker is considered an employee of multiple employers).  The previous guidance stated that the DOL would find an entity to be a joint employer if it exerted even “indirect control” over a worker, while joint employment previously required more direct control of the worker.  The guidance specifically highlighted staffing agencies and sub-contractors as potentially creating joint employment.  It additionally stated that “most workers are employees under the FLSA” and independent contractor status was likely to be found only when the worker “is really in business for him or herself,” de-emphasizing control of the worker’s work as a deciding factor.

The DOL’s statement points out: “Removal of the administrator interpretations does not change the legal responsibilities of employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, as reflected in the department’s long-standing regulations and case law.”  However, even if the legal standards remain unchanged, the withdrawal of these opinions likely demonstrates a shift in the DOL’s interpretation and enforcement away from the prior administration’s expansive approach toward employment status of workers.

Employers should continue to be ensure that employees are not improperly classified as independent contractors and that joint employment relationships are not inadvertently created.  However, employers need not worry that tangential, indirect acts of control of another’s employees could result in a joint employment finding, nor should employers hesitate to classify workers as independent contractors in appropriate situations.

News

Zwilling to Present Webinar on Surviving Social Inflation and Nuclear Judgments in E&O Litigation

Course Description: A $1 million E&O claim walks into a courtroom and comes out a $15 million nuclear verdict.  Unfortunately, that’s not the setup to a joke-it’s the new reality of professional liability litigation. Social inflation isn’t just a buzzword anymore; it’s the single biggest force reshaping the E&O landscape.  […]

Holder Joins USLAW Live! Podcast

Join Carr Allison shareholder Nicole M. Holder on the latest USLAW Live! podcast episode as she discusses Mississippi’s legal landscape and the issues impacting litigation across the state. Nikki shares insights on comparative fault, damages caps, Chancery Court practice, and other important legal developments affecting businesses and insurers in Mississippi. […]

Sausaman Granted a Summary Judgment

Alison H. Sausaman of our Jacksonville (FL) office won a recent appeal of an order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on behalf of a convenience store. The Fifth District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s order, which held that an undefined change in elevation where concrete met asphalt […]


US Law Network Inc EC Defense Network Professional Liability Attorney Network