Darmer Presents at DRI Product Liability Conference

Angel A. Darmer of Carr Allison and Scott D. Raszeja of AEI Corporation co-presented at DRI’s Product Liability Conference in New Orleans on Friday, February 7, 2020.  The theme of their presentation was: The Ubiquitous Printed Circuit Board – Case Studies in Hardware Failure.   They provided attendees with an insider’s guide on the design, assembly, and use issues that can lead to product failures and coordinating with expert witnesses to prepare a legal defense to resulting products liability claims.

Darmer is a shareholder with Carr Allison in the firm’s Birmingham, Alabama office.  Darmer’s litigation practice is primarily focused on the defense of local, regional and national manufacturers, distributors, retailers and restaurants in class actions, personal injury, premises liability and products liability matters.

To learn more about about this conference and/or more about DRI please visit HERE.

News

Taylor Named to a Leadership Position with claimsXchange

Carr Allison attorney Jeremy P. Taylor of our Mobile (AL) office was recently appointed to an educational leadership position within the transportation section for claimsXchange. He looks forward to partnering with them to provide cutting edge training within the industry. Congratulations!

Learn More

Zwilling to Present Webinar On A Little Bit About a Lot: Tips on Successfully Handling Common Employment Issues

What steps should an employer take in response to a complaint of harassment?  What conditions constitute a disability and what protections exist for employees regarding the same?  How should claims of discrimination be investigated?  What steps should be taken before a poor performer’s employment is terminated?  During this webinar, we […]

Learn More

Frederick and Weaver Obtain Summary Judgment

Carr Allison attorneys Charles Frederick and Kyle Weaver of our Orlando and Tallahassee (FL) offices recently won a motion for summary judgment on behalf of a national client. Our attorneys argued that the Court was able to rely on photographs that blatantly contradicted the plaintiff’s statements. The Court sided with […]

Learn More