Three noteworthy Premises Liability verdicts in Tennessee

Davidson County (Nashville). While walking down an aisle of a retailer, the plaintiff slipped on a wet floor and fell, tearing her meniscus tendon, and requiring surgery. Plaintiff’s primary proof was the store manager had walked the area moments before the plaintiff fell and had not addressed the wet floor. The defendant denied having actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition. The jury returned a verdict of 90% as to the defendant and 10% to the plaintiff, and awarded plaintiff $525,000. After reducing plaintiff’s comparative fault, the Court entered a judgment in the amount of $472,500.

Henry County (near Memphis). The plaintiff, 12 years of age, was playing outside an apartment. As he ran through the grass, he tripped in a hidden hole. The boy broke his hand on a growth plate, as well as three fingers. The boy’s mother sued the apartment, alleging that it failed to inspect and maintain the property. The apartment complex disputed that the hole was even on its property. They also implicated the plaintiff’s comparative fault, as there was proof that the child was racing another child at the time of his fall. The jury found both the boy and the apartment complex equally at fault and, therefore, found in favor of the defendant.

Davidson County (Nashville). The plaintiff entered a convenience store in downtown Nashville. She walked in and proceeded through the aisle to the bathroom. Upon exiting the bathroom a few minutes later, she slipped and fell on a just-mopped floor. Allegedly, the store employee had mopped the floor while she was in the bathroom. Plaintiff sustained a torn rotator cuff that had to be surgically repaired. The plaintiff’s medical bills totaled $46,277.00. Plaintiff alleged that the store was negligent for mopping the floor without placing a warning sign, and that having the floor mopped while she was in the bathroom, she had no reason to anticipate the peril. The convenience store argued that a wet floor sign was placed at the front of the store and that they denied that the employee would have had enough time to mop the floor while the plaintiff was in the bathroom. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, but assessed 49% fault to the plaintiff. They awarded damages in the amount of $46,277; plaintiff’s medical bills. After applying the comparative fault percentage, judgment was entered against the defendants in the amount of $23,601.

Sean W. Martin is a shareholder in the Chattanooga, Tennessee office and can be reached at swmartin@carrallison.com and (423) 648-9834.

News

Zwilling to Present Webinar on Cyber Meets E&O at the Coverage Crossroads

Course Description: When a ransomware attack takes down your client’s systems, is it a cyber claim, an E&O claim-or both?  When their vendor’s software update crashes 8.5 million computers worldwide, who’s left holding the bag?  Welcome to the coverage crossroads where cyber meets E&O, and the stakes have never been […]

Learn More

Wells Speaks at Federal Court Naturalization Ceremony for New Citizens

Carr Allison shareholder and retired Mobile County District Judge Judson W. Wells, Sr. recently spoke at the March Naturalization Ceremony in Mobile. The formal ceremony was conducted by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. In his capacity as Past President of the Mobile Bar Association, Judge Wells […]

Learn More

Zwilling to Present Webinar on AI in Employment Decisions and What Employers Need to Know

Course Description: Is your company using AI to screen resumes, conduct video interviews, or make hiring decisions?  If so, you could be facing significant legal exposure without even knowing it.  With new laws in Illinois, Colorado, New York City, and other jurisdictions imposing strict requirements on employers using artificial intelligence, […]

Learn More