Tennessee Supreme Court issues key decision for healthcare industry

Tennessee Supreme Court Unanimously Holds Estate of French v. Stratford House, 333 S.W.3d 546 (Tenn. 2011) is statutorily abrogated by Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-101 et seq. (Tennessee Healthcare Liability Act)

Ellithorpe v. Weismark, 2015 Tenn. LEXIS 827 (Tenn. Oct. 8, 2015)

On July 11, 2011, the Tennessee Supreme Court decided Estate of French v. Stratford House, 333 S.W.3d 546 (Tenn. 2011) where it was tasked with clarifying the procedure courts and litigants must adhere to when determining whether a claim is one for medical malpractice, thus subject to additional requirements under the Tennessee Medical Malpractice Act, or one of ordinary (common law) negligence. In its opinion, the Court “abandoned the broad ‘gravamen of the Complaint’ test… in favor of a ‘a more nuanced approach’ in which the trial court must examine the claims individually to determine whether they sound in ordinary negligence or medical malpractice.” Estate of French v. Stratford House, 333 S.W.3d at 560 (Tenn. 2011). As a result of Estate of French, a plaintiff could, through creative drafting of the Complaint, maintain a medical malpractice case without having to comply with the requirements of the Medical Malpractice Act.

Four months after French was published, the Tennessee Legislature overhauled the Tennessee Medical Malpractice Act as part of the Tennessee Civil Justice Act of 2011. Notably, the new act called the Tennessee Healthcare Liability Act removed all references to medical malpractice and substituted it for healthcare liability and healthcare liability action. Moreover, the statutory scheme defines healthcare liability action as “any civil action, including claims against the state or a political subdivision thereof, alleging that a healthcare provider or providers have caused an injury related to the provisions of, or failure to provide, healthcare services to a person, regardless of the theory of liability upon which the action is based.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-101(a)(1) (2011). The Act also provides that “[a]ny such civil action or claim is subject to the provisions of this part regardless of any other claims, causes of action, or theories of liability alleged in the Complaint.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-101(c).

In interpreting this statute, the Supreme Court holds that Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-101 clearly establishes a legislative intent that all civil actions alleging that a healthcare provider has caused injury relating to providing or failing to provide healthcare services must comply with the Healthcare Liability Act, regardless of how the Complaint is worded or the nomenclature given to the claims by the plaintiff in the Complaint. In so doing, the Estate of French and its progeny have been statutorily abrogated.

For more information, please contact Sean W. Martin at swmartin@carrallison.com.

News

Sausaman Prevails on a Motion for Summary Judgement

Alison H. Sausaman of our Jacksonville (FL) office prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in federal court on behalf of a national convenience store chain. The court agreed that rain on an asphalt parking lot was not a dangerous condition and granted final judgment in our client’s favor.

Learn More

Baggett and Ingram Prevail on a Motion for Judgement

Evan Baggett and Josh Ingram of our Birmingham (AL) office recently prevailed on a motion for judgment on the pleadings in a complex tort case. After extensive briefing and oral arguments, the court granted their motion and dismissed all the plaintiff’s claims with prejudice.

Learn More

Thornton Elected as USLAW Network, Inc. Secretary/ Treasurer 2025-26

Carr Allison congratulates shareholder Thomas S. Thornton, III of our Birmingham (AL) office on being re-elected to the 2025-26 USLAW Executive Committee where he will now serve as Secretary/ Treasurer.

Learn More