Peter C. BobolisAssociate

Primary Office

6251 Monroe Street
Suite 200
Daphne, AL 36526

Phone

251.626.9340
251.626.8928 (fax)

Professional Profile

Peter is an associate in Carr Allison’s Mobile (AL) office. He is admitted to practice in Alabama and focuses his practice on defending matters involving transportation, personal injury, workers’ compensation, general litigation and insurance.

Peter graduated from Pennsylvania State University with a Bachelor of Science in finance. From there he attended Florida State University where he received his Master of Business Administration degree. He then earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Alabama School of Law.

Peter is originally from Laurel (MD) and enjoys playing guitar, muscle cars and working out.

Practice Areas

Admitted to Practice

Alabama

Education

BS, Pennsylvania State University

MBA, Florida State University

JD, University of Alabama School of Law

Affiliations

Baldwin County Bar Association

Mobile Bar Association

News

Taylor Named to a Leadership Position with claimsXchange

Carr Allison attorney Jeremy P. Taylor of our Mobile (AL) office was recently appointed to an educational leadership position within the transportation section for claimsXchange. He looks forward to partnering with them to provide cutting edge training within the industry. Congratulations!

Learn More

Zwilling to Present Webinar On A Little Bit About a Lot: Tips on Successfully Handling Common Employment Issues

What steps should an employer take in response to a complaint of harassment?  What conditions constitute a disability and what protections exist for employees regarding the same?  How should claims of discrimination be investigated?  What steps should be taken before a poor performer’s employment is terminated?  During this webinar, we […]

Learn More

Frederick and Weaver Obtain Summary Judgment

Carr Allison attorneys Charles Frederick and Kyle Weaver of our Orlando and Tallahassee (FL) offices recently won a motion for summary judgment on behalf of a national client. Our attorneys argued that the Court was able to rely on photographs that blatantly contradicted the plaintiff’s statements. The Court sided with […]

Learn More